<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://weait.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>use case</title>
 <link>http://weait.com/category/post/use-case</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ODbL Use Cases Illustrated</title>
 <link>http://weait.com/content/odbl-use-cases-illustrated</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update in progress.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://weait.com/files/license.png&quot; alt=&quot;ODbL use case illustrated&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The OpenStreetMap project is anticipating a license change.  In fact the project has been anticipating this change for a while.  Now it seems imminent.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A draft license for the database was released Friday, 27 February 2009 along with a data license.  The proposal for consideration is, &quot;Should OpenStreetMap transition from cc-by-sa, to ODbL?&quot;  I say &quot;Yes.&quot;  Why we need to transition away from cc-by-sa has been offered elsewhere.  Here is why ODbL is the license to which we should transition. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://weait.com/content/odbl-use-cases-illustrated&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://weait.com/content/odbl-use-cases-illustrated#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://weait.com/category/post/license">license</category>
 <category domain="http://weait.com/category/post/odbl">ODbL</category>
 <category domain="http://weait.com/category/post/openstreetmap">OpenStreetMap</category>
 <category domain="http://weait.com/category/post/osm">osm</category>
 <category domain="http://weait.com/category/post/use-case">use case</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:35:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rw</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">60 at http://weait.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

